CASE STUDIES / DEVELOPER TOOLING

Turning AI-assisted coding into a reviewable engineering process.

AI engineering workflow

Implemented software

An anonymous project story. Client, individual and internal project names are omitted.

The challenge

An AI coding workflow needed a clear boundary between approved requirements, implementation and review.

The work

Developed an editor extension with separate planning and implementation roles, human-approved specifications, automated scope checks and a review pipeline. Integrity, scope and code checks run before model review.

What the project demonstrates

The implementation provides a repeatable design, build, check and fix loop, with recorded review decisions. The documented result is working engineering tooling; no commercial productivity claim is made.

Technology & expertise

TypeScript · Editor extensions · Automated quality gates

Where this approach fits

For teams exploring AI-assisted development with clear ownership and review checkpoints.

Have a similar challenge?

Start with a focused discovery or POC, scope production work when the evidence supports it, and add ongoing support as your needs grow.

Projects: US$1,000–$50,000. Support: US$500–$5,000/month. Each stage is scoped separately.

Discuss a similar project ↗